Malcom Gladwell's necessities for success

    What do you need to succeed in life? This is a popular question – I mean who doesn’t want to succeed in life – with a variety of answers: Hard work, communication skills, a positive attitude, and much more. However, what if you were told that there were two things that were more important which could lead you to success: Opportunity and cultural legacies. Although this sounds way too simple, Outliers: The Story of Success written by Malcolm Gladwell, shows how this is true by looking at the case for some of the most successful people, including Bill Gates, the Beatles, and Mozart. This book also looks at data sets and experiments conducted to make these points stronger.

  The first section of the book focuses on opportunities; how successful people in the past and present had opportunities that they did not create themselves, which had greatly benefited them. Each chapter in the section looks at something different that allows these people to gain opportunities, such as when they were born (not just the year but also the month). My favorite chapter in this section was on an experiment conducted by Lewis Terman, who created the Stanford-Binet IQ test, where he gathered approximately 1500 students with the highest IQ and tracked them as they grew up. His hypothesis was that these high IQ students (which he strangely called the “Termites”) would have successful careers and even win the Nobel Prize. Although some of them did have great careers, others had careers that even he thought were not successful and none of them won the Nobel Prize. In fact, two students he had cut off because their IQ wasn’t “high enough” had won the Nobel prize. His conclusion was that “intellect and achievement are far from perfectly correlated” (Gladwell, Chap. 3 Sec. 5).

    The second section of the book focuses on cultural legacies; how people behave based on their ancestors. The section starts off like a mystery novel with a case in the 1800s where a southerner, Wix Howard, killed a man after being accused of cheating in a game of poker. However, very surprisingly, Howard was ruled innocent by the jury (in fact only one jury had said guilty) as the culture said, “that murder – under those circumstances – was not a crime” (Gladwell, Chap 6. Sec. 2) Additionally, in the early 1990s, two psychologists conducted an experiment which saw that insulting and provoking a southerner would be much more dangerous than a northerner (now of course this isn’t saying that all ­southerners get angry easily). This experiment saw that the behavior of the southerners were carried on from their ancestors. I found this section very interesting as cultural legacies are something that are not controllable (you are born into the cultural legacy), which would potentially impact your success.

    In conclusion, Outliers: The Story of Success is a book which presents experiments and data to show how important opportunities and cultural legacies are to a person’s success. Now this obviously doesn’t mean things like practice and hard work are not important, it’s just that the opportunities and cultural legacies gift chances for more practice and work, which lead to a better chance of success. This is a great book to read in your free time as it has a mixture of stories and information, and will help with boredom.


P.S: The answer to the IQ test was A but I still don't understand it. Please tell me if you figure it out

-        - Yuto. I

(P

Comments

  1. Very good blog Yuto, I find it very interesting that IQ seems to have a small effect on how successful a person is in life. did the study also track the worst performing students to see how their careers were?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Yuto, really cool blog! I found it interesting how your cultural legacy affects you, whether it be your personality, or your opportunities for success. Also, do you know why Howard was ruled innocent (almost unanimously) by the jury?

    By the way I think I kind of cheesed the IQ test. Here's my probably unintended and much too overcomplicated thought process/solution that I spent too much time on:

    Consider the top-left 3x3 grid, for example:

    DCC
    DDC
    HHH
    where D = diamond, C = club, and H = heart.

    We imagine that for every iteration of each 3x3 grid, the grid "shifts" to the left. The leftmost two diamonds are discarded, and the new 3x3 grid looks like this:

    CC_
    DC_
    HH_
    ("_" meaning an empty spot)
    Then, every D becomes a C, every C becomes a H, and every H becomes a D. The result is this:

    HH_
    CH_
    DD_

    This matches the next 3x3 grid, the top-middle one. We then repeat this process one more time:

    H__
    H__
    D__
    (after it is shifted to the left)

    and then we convert, again, with D to C, C to H, H to D:

    D__
    D__
    C__

    Therefore, we find the leftmost column of of our rightmost 3x3 grid. We repeat the whole process for the bottom row of 3x3 grids, and we find that the final arrangement looks like this:

    H__
    D__
    H__

    Answer choice A is the only choice that has this pattern, so therefore the answer is A!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wowwww. Thanks for the very well written explanation!
      For why Howard was not deemed guilty, I've done some research on it but I'm not 100% sure why he wasn't guilty. But Gladwell was saying that these Southerner's had this kind of pride and honor in them that they couldn't handle being accused or mocked, and so I'm guessing the jury just understood that(?)

      Delete
  3. Hi Yuto, this blog was very interesting to read! I've never really thought about how cultural history can play into your life. Great blog! (i'm gonna try to solve the iq question now)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Yuto, great review! I loved how you summarized the IQ test segment, and how you showed that these tests mean nothing, and how the people who had a "low iq" ended up outperforming the people with high iqs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The basics to photography: "Photo Basics"

I Read the Hunger Games in One Night, Was it Worth It?

Why Greg Heffley is an Unreliable Narrator and is Also Possibly the Worst Character in Literary History